The Times of London (owned by Rupert Murdoch) has decided maybe there wasn't so much to those "climategate" letters as they pretended there was. Actually, they say now, there really was nothing to them, just like every sane person that looked at them thought. [more here, here, and here]
I would like to quote the Newsweek article about why this retraction will make no difference because it's an excellent summation of what's known about this: "One of the strongest, most-repeated findings in the psychology of belief is that once people have been told X, especially if X is shocking, if they are later told, 'No, we were wrong about X,' most people still believe X." This effect is even more pronounced amongst conservatives.
Alan Miller & Dr. David Overbey
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(282)
-
▼
June
(21)
- More Alabama Bat Shit
- NASA Timelapse of Oil Spill
- Ogre-oid: Six Months Too Late - Times Retracts "C...
- Modus Operandi Podcast episode 24
- Disclose Act
- Ogre-oid: UK Values Coal Co. Sponsorship Over Wen...
- Modus Operandi Podcast episode 23
- Energy Independence - A Daily Show History of Empt...
- Ogre-oid: Elton John Plays Limbaugh Wedding
- Anti-Ogre-oid: Touchdown Jesus Burns to a Metal F...
- Modus Operandi Podcast episode 22
- Continuing Ogre-oid: Militarization of U.S. Polic...
- Continuing Ogre-oid: Obama Most Aggressive Presid...
- Inflation Manipulation? Screwing the Numbers
- The Horror.
- A Letter
- Why the Tea Party May be Good for Dems
- Modus Operandi Podcast episode 21
- Ogre-oids, June 3, 2010
- Fucking Booming
- Ogre-oid: Israel
-
▼
June
(21)
No comments:
Post a Comment